I should really link to RustBelt *oops*
authorRalf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:12:22 +0000 (16:12 -0700)
committerRalf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Mon, 12 Jun 2017 23:12:22 +0000 (16:12 -0700)
ralf/_posts/2015-10-12-formalizing-rust.md

index b867ffb80a9f4e0bd2b69871d22cc5d8f4e67e21..548fbd9297a6dc9b67814ad768c454d905a27166 100644 (file)
@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ It's going to be fun! Honestly, that's enough of a reason for me.
 But there are other reasons: It shouldn't be a surprise that [bugs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24292) have [been](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/25860) [found](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24880) in Rust.
 There are lots of things that can be done about such bugs -- my take on this is that we should try to *prove*, in a mathematical rigorous way, that no such bugs exist in Rust.
 This goes hand-in-hand with other approaches like testing, fuzzing and [static analysis](https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~emina/pubs/crust.ase15.pdf).
-However, we (at my [research group](http://plv.mpi-sws.org/)) are into formalizing things, so that's what we are going to do.
+However, we (at my [research group](http://plv.mpi-sws.org/)) are into formalizing things, so that's what we are going to do as part of the [RustBelt](http://plv.mpi-sws.org/rustbelt/) research project.
+
+**Update:** Added link to RustBelt website.
 
 <!-- MORE -->