add thanks

diff --git a/ralf/_posts/2018-07-24-pointers-and-bytes.md b/ralf/_posts/2018-07-24-pointers-and-bytes.md
index a51fb48652b79c9adbebe92fe018407ecca1249e..8338de4274e405b5a347cbf3973a9a44c06b3eeb 100644 (file)
--- a/ralf/_posts/2018-07-24-pointers-and-bytes.md
+++ b/ralf/_posts/2018-07-24-pointers-and-bytes.md
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ Using `Uninit` instead of an arbitrary bit pattern means miri can, in a single e
 We have seen that pointers can be different even when they point to the same address, and that a byte is more than just a number in `0..256`.[^4]
 With this, I think we are ready to look at a first draft of my "2018 memory model" (working title ;) -- in the next post. :)
 
+Thanks to @rkruppe and @nagisa for help in finding arguments for why `Uninit` is needed.
 If you have any questions, feel free to [ask in the forums](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pointers-are-complicated-or-whats-in-a-byte/8045)!
 
 [^4]: And just to be clear, I am talking about a pointer or byte in the model of an optimized *programming language* here.  When modeling hardware, everything is different.