Fixed typo.

[rust-101.git] / src / part11.rs

diff --git a/src/part11.rs b/src/part11.rs
index 9d931db73b41fc912c1885ab74075890ab8eb99b..757f2057e814a57ff6f9aec5d316f4957ae65675 100644 (file)
--- a/src/part11.rs
+++ b/src/part11.rs
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ struct CallbacksV1<F: FnMut(i32)> {
 //@ But, Rust complains about this definition. It says something about "Sized". What's the trouble? See, for many things we want to do, it is crucial that
 //@ Rust knows the precise, fixed size of the type - that is, how large this type will be when represented in memory. For example, for a `Vec`, the
 //@ elements are stored one right after the other. How should that be possible, without a fixed size? The point is, `FnMut(i32)` could be of any size.
 //@ But, Rust complains about this definition. It says something about "Sized". What's the trouble? See, for many things we want to do, it is crucial that
 //@ Rust knows the precise, fixed size of the type - that is, how large this type will be when represented in memory. For example, for a `Vec`, the
 //@ elements are stored one right after the other. How should that be possible, without a fixed size? The point is, `FnMut(i32)` could be of any size.

-//@ We don't know how large that "type that implemenets `FnMut(i32)`" is. Rust calls this an *unsized* type. Whenever we introduce a type variable, Rust
+//@ We don't know how large that "type that implements `FnMut(i32)`" is. Rust calls this an *unsized* type. Whenever we introduce a type variable, Rust

 //@ will implicitly add a bound to that variable, demanding that it is sized. That's why we did not have to worry about this so far. <br/>
 //@ You can opt-out of this implicit bound by saying `T: ?Sized`. Then `T` may or may not be sized.
 
 //@ will implicitly add a bound to that variable, demanding that it is sized. That's why we did not have to worry about this so far. <br/>
 //@ You can opt-out of this implicit bound by saying `T: ?Sized`. Then `T` may or may not be sized.
 


@@ -115,6 +115,6 @@ pub fn main() {
 
 // **Exercise 11.1**: We made the arbitrary choice of using `i32` for the arguments. Generalize the data structures above
 // to work with an arbitrary type `T` that's passed to the callbacks. Since you need to call multiple callbacks with the
 
 // **Exercise 11.1**: We made the arbitrary choice of using `i32` for the arguments. Generalize the data structures above
 // to work with an arbitrary type `T` that's passed to the callbacks. Since you need to call multiple callbacks with the

-// same `t: T`, you will either have to restrict `T` to `Copy` types, or pass a reference.
+// same `val: T` (in our `call` function), you will either have to restrict `T` to `Copy` types, or pass a reference.

 
 //@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part10.html) | [raw source](workspace/src/part11.rs) | [next](part12.html)
 
 //@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part10.html) | [raw source](workspace/src/part11.rs) | [next](part12.html)