s/implemenets/implements/

[rust-101.git] / src / part13.rs

diff --git a/src/part13.rs b/src/part13.rs
index 9f42b8223771ee7a9c5d2d4bed804fdee30cf8f9..8edcc9912db61ce1ec85b0bab10382772788c61f 100644 (file)
--- a/src/part13.rs
+++ b/src/part13.rs
@@ -159,15 +159,15 @@ pub fn main() {
 //@ programs memory safe, and that prevents us from invalidating iterators, also helps secure our multi-threaded code against
 //@ data races. For example, notice how `read_files` sends a `String` to `filter_lines`. At run-time, only the pointer to
 //@ the character data will actually be moved around (just like when a `String` is passed to a function with full ownership). However,
 //@ programs memory safe, and that prevents us from invalidating iterators, also helps secure our multi-threaded code against
 //@ data races. For example, notice how `read_files` sends a `String` to `filter_lines`. At run-time, only the pointer to
 //@ the character data will actually be moved around (just like when a `String` is passed to a function with full ownership). However,

-//@ `read_files` has to *give up* ownership of the string to perform `send`, to it is impossible for an outstanding borrow to
-//@ still be around. After it sent the string to the other side, `read_files` has no pointer into the string content
+//@ `read_files` has to *give up* ownership of the string to perform `send`, to it is impossible for the string to still be borrowed.
+//@ After it sent the string to the other side, `read_files` has no pointer into the string content

 //@ anymore, and hence no way to race on the data with someone else.
 //@ 
 //@ There is a little more to this. Remember the `'static` bound we had to add to `register` in the previous parts, to make
 //@ sure that the callbacks do not reference any pointers that might become invalid? This is just as crucial for spawning
 //@ a thread: In general, that thread could last for much longer than the current stack frame. Thus, it must not use
 //@ any pointers to data in that stack frame. This is achieved by requiring the `FnOnce` closure passed to `thread::spawn`
 //@ anymore, and hence no way to race on the data with someone else.
 //@ 
 //@ There is a little more to this. Remember the `'static` bound we had to add to `register` in the previous parts, to make
 //@ sure that the callbacks do not reference any pointers that might become invalid? This is just as crucial for spawning
 //@ a thread: In general, that thread could last for much longer than the current stack frame. Thus, it must not use
 //@ any pointers to data in that stack frame. This is achieved by requiring the `FnOnce` closure passed to `thread::spawn`

-//@ to be valid for lifetime `'static`, as you can see in [its documentation](http://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/fn.spawn.html).
+//@ to be valid for lifetime `'static`, as you can see in [its documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/thread/fn.spawn.html).

 //@ This avoids another kind of data race, where the thread's access races with the callee deallocating its stack frame.
 //@ It is only thanks to the concept of lifetimes that this can be expressed as part of the type of `spawn`.
 
 //@ This avoids another kind of data race, where the thread's access races with the callee deallocating its stack frame.
 //@ It is only thanks to the concept of lifetimes that this can be expressed as part of the type of `spawn`.
 


@@ -189,4 +189,4 @@ pub fn main() {
 //@ So if the environment of your closure contains an `Rc`, it won't be `Send`, preventing it from causing trouble. If however every
 //@ captured variable *is* `Send`, then so is the entire environment, and you are good.
 
 //@ So if the environment of your closure contains an `Rc`, it won't be `Send`, preventing it from causing trouble. If however every
 //@ captured variable *is* `Send`, then so is the entire environment, and you are good.
 

-//@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part12.html) | [next](part14.html)
+//@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part12.html) | [raw source](workspace/src/part13.rs) | [next](part14.html)