recommend bubblejail for people that want a more ouf-of-the-box experience

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 5d74547809ad59c46afa8fded0af14d48bee0b96..cee1e667dad961b75215959768285056cc2711a0 100644 (file)
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ tool to easily sandbox Linux applications.
 
 The primary use-case for BubbleBox is running applications that you do not trust enough
 to give them full access to hour home directory, and in particular the secret keys stored there.
 
 The primary use-case for BubbleBox is running applications that you do not trust enough
 to give them full access to hour home directory, and in particular the secret keys stored there.

-In this regard it is similar to [firejail] and [bubblejail], but less powerful and in exchange hopefully easier to configure.

 BubbleBox is based on [bubblewrap] and [xdg-dbus-proxy] which do all of the heavy lifting.
 
 BubbleBox is based on [bubblewrap] and [xdg-dbus-proxy] which do all of the heavy lifting.
 

+The goals of this project are similar to [firejail], but I found firejail's configuration to be extremely hard to maintain and debug.
+BubbleBox is meant for people that are comfortable editing its Python source code to adjust it to their needs;
+if you are looking for something with a more out-of-the-box experience, try [bubblejail].
+

 [firejail]: https://firejail.wordpress.com/
 [bubblejail]: https://github.com/igo95862/bubblejail
 [bubblewrap]: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap
 [firejail]: https://firejail.wordpress.com/
 [bubblejail]: https://github.com/igo95862/bubblejail
 [bubblewrap]: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap