the ACM news is out :)

[web.git] / personal / _posts / 2018-07-11-research-assistant.md

diff --git a/personal/_posts/2018-07-11-research-assistant.md b/personal/_posts/2018-07-11-research-assistant.md
index 24b3f71c098ec4afa530707ab0577a2677269251..0641bef4b61960235da387279aaf0a0fa2482cb4 100644 (file)
--- a/personal/_posts/2018-07-11-research-assistant.md
+++ b/personal/_posts/2018-07-11-research-assistant.md
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ I don't really know what a "research assistant" is, but I am going to continue t
 
 <!-- MORE -->
 
-After exploring [a "validity"-based model]({% post_url 2017-08-11-types-as-contracts-evaluation %}) last year, I am going to be looking at an "alias"-based model this year.
+After exploring [a "validity"-based model]({% post_url 2017-08-11-types-as-contracts-evaluation %}) last year, I am going to be looking at an "access"-based model this year.
 That's the kind of model @arielb1, @ubsan and others have been proposing, and I am going to build on top of their work and hopefully come up with something we can actually implement a checker for
 (staying true to the [vision I laid out previously]({% post_url 2017-06-06-MIR-semantics %}) that we should have an executable operational semantics for MIR, including its [undefined behavior]({% post_url 2017-07-14-undefined-behavior %})).
-Expect a blog post soon for what I mean by "validity"-based vs. "alias"-based, and for a first draft of such an "alias"-based model.
+Expect a blog post soon for what I mean by "validity"-based vs. "alias"-based, and for a first draft of such an "access"-based model.
 
 Until then, stay tuned!