From 8a997c3d9a404ff655ecaea1e2f8a2184285123d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:12:22 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] I should really link to RustBelt *oops* --- personal/_posts/2015-10-12-formalizing-rust.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/personal/_posts/2015-10-12-formalizing-rust.md b/personal/_posts/2015-10-12-formalizing-rust.md index b867ffb..548fbd9 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2015-10-12-formalizing-rust.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2015-10-12-formalizing-rust.md @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ It's going to be fun! Honestly, that's enough of a reason for me. But there are other reasons: It shouldn't be a surprise that [bugs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24292) have [been](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/25860) [found](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24880) in Rust. There are lots of things that can be done about such bugs -- my take on this is that we should try to *prove*, in a mathematical rigorous way, that no such bugs exist in Rust. This goes hand-in-hand with other approaches like testing, fuzzing and [static analysis](https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~emina/pubs/crust.ase15.pdf). -However, we (at my [research group](http://plv.mpi-sws.org/)) are into formalizing things, so that's what we are going to do. +However, we (at my [research group](http://plv.mpi-sws.org/)) are into formalizing things, so that's what we are going to do as part of the [RustBelt](http://plv.mpi-sws.org/rustbelt/) research project. + +**Update:** Added link to RustBelt website. -- 2.30.2