From 8707d66e6735c8593ccc8c574e2384262aedbdc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:15:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] uninit post: add forward link to provenance post --- ralf/_posts/2019-07-14-uninit.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ralf/_posts/2019-07-14-uninit.md b/ralf/_posts/2019-07-14-uninit.md index b25a052..7d056c7 100644 --- a/ralf/_posts/2019-07-14-uninit.md +++ b/ralf/_posts/2019-07-14-uninit.md @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ The Rust abstract machine *does* make a distinction between "relaxed" and "relea After all, x86 does not have "uninitialized bytes" either, and still our example program above went wrong. Of course, to explain *why* the abstract machine is defined the way it is, we have to look at optimizations and hardware-level concerns. -But without an abstract machine, it is very hard to ensure that all the optimizations a compiler performs are consistent---in fact, both [LLVM](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35229) and [GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752) suffer from miscompilations caused by combining optimizations that all seem fine in isolation, but together cause incorrect code generation. +But without an abstract machine, it is very hard to ensure that all the optimizations a compiler performs are consistent---in fact, both [LLVM](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35229) and [GCC](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752) suffer from miscompilations caused by combining optimizations that all seem [fine in isolation, but together cause incorrect code generation]({% post_url 2020-12-14-provenance %}). The abstract machine is needed as an ultimate arbiter that determines which optimizations can be safely combined with each other. I also think that when writing unsafe code, it is much easier to keep in your head a fixed abstract machine as opposed to a set of optimizations that might change any time, and might or might not be applied in any order. -- 2.30.2