From 281150e8bd74bf568a4561f3c86b7879405a64f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 12:23:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] typo --- personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md b/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md index 10b2e44..0314fbb 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ The model I am proposing here is by far not the first attempt at giving a defini But before I delve into my latest proposal, I want to briefly discuss a key difference between my previous model and this one: -"Types as Contracts" was a fully "validity"-based model, while "Stacked Borrows" is (to some extend) "access"-based. +"Types as Contracts" was a fully "validity"-based model, while "Stacked Borrows" is (to some extent) "access"-based. ## 1 Validity-based vs. Access-based -- 2.30.2