From 039011461c0b0f207f53d08a084c7f3471578394 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 12:14:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] more clearly mark the original post as historic --- personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md b/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md index 0f36e05..7397780 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ But before I delve into my latest proposal, I want to briefly discuss a key diff **Update:** Since publishing this post, I have written [another]({% post_url 2018-11-16-stacked-borrows-implementation %}) blog post about a slightly adjusted version of Stacked Borrows (the first version that actually got implemented). That other post is self-contained, so if you are just interested in the current state of Stacked Borrows, I suggest you go there. +Only go on reading here if you want some additional historic context. **/Update** ## 1 Validity-based vs. Access-based -- 2.30.2