From: Ralf Jung Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:44:54 +0000 (+0200) Subject: thank centril X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/web.git/commitdiff_plain/fe0a377b987fe288a1b26904a8ba78928edff09c thank centril --- diff --git a/personal/_posts/2018-07-19-const.md b/personal/_posts/2018-07-19-const.md index f511b9f..da18fc1 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2018-07-19-const.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2018-07-19-const.md @@ -233,5 +233,5 @@ In particular, I propose that *when type-checking safe code in const context, we There are still plenty of open questions, in particular around the interaction of [`const fn` and traits](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/24111#issuecomment-311029471), but I hope this terminology is useful when having those discussions. Let the type systems guide us :) -Thanks to @oli-obk for feedback on a draft of this post. +Thanks to @oli-obk for feedback on a draft of this post, and to @centril for interesting discussion in #rust-lang that triggered me into developing these ideas and terminology. If you have feedback or questions, [let's discuss in the internals forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/thoughts-on-compile-time-function-evaluation-and-type-systems/8004)!