From: Ralf Jung Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 10:30:11 +0000 (+0100) Subject: link to forum X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/web.git/commitdiff_plain/815e6ab35e8ad5b12c0bf12c83c01cdd0bcfb539 link to forum --- diff --git a/personal/_posts/2018-01-31-sharing-for-a-lifetime.md b/personal/_posts/2018-01-31-sharing-for-a-lifetime.md index 25b0bec..b009527 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2018-01-31-sharing-for-a-lifetime.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2018-01-31-sharing-for-a-lifetime.md @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ --- title: "Sharing for a Lifetime" categories: research rust +forum: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/sharing-for-a-lifetime/6675 --- This post is about an aspect of the [RustBelt paper]({{ site.baseurl }}{% post_url 2017-07-08-rustbelt %}). @@ -153,6 +154,5 @@ So, maybe this is some extremely ingenious idea that the Rust devs had without e And then there is the question: Why exactly two modes? Would it be worth having more? I honestly don't know, but I had to think of this a while back when I read [this post by glaebhoerl](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-t-clone-for-cell-rc-t/5397), the first part of which I would translate as "`Cell` could be considered a mode". -If you have any comments or thoughts on this, please join the discussion! -I will create a thread in the Rust internal forums shortly. +If you have any comments or thoughts on this, please join the [discussion in the Rust forums](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/sharing-for-a-lifetime/6675)! I'd also be interested in feedback on how understandable this post is; this is my first attempt at translating research results into a blog post.