From: Ralf Jung Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 10:23:39 +0000 (+0200) Subject: typo X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/web.git/commitdiff_plain/281150e8bd74bf568a4561f3c86b7879405a64f8?ds=inline;hp=8a80fe7f85fc6ee9c6f4d4e85516b544998de57b typo --- diff --git a/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md b/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md index 10b2e44..0314fbb 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2018-08-07-stacked-borrows.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ The model I am proposing here is by far not the first attempt at giving a defini But before I delve into my latest proposal, I want to briefly discuss a key difference between my previous model and this one: -"Types as Contracts" was a fully "validity"-based model, while "Stacked Borrows" is (to some extend) "access"-based. +"Types as Contracts" was a fully "validity"-based model, while "Stacked Borrows" is (to some extent) "access"-based. ## 1 Validity-based vs. Access-based