X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/web.git/blobdiff_plain/9131d1a0288847311e6d15fb8c0cda54d6815d7f..25cdafc51c73f06f32f5ef5c84fa01fe98c63de4:/personal/_posts/2017-06-09-mutexguard-sync.md diff --git a/personal/_posts/2017-06-09-mutexguard-sync.md b/personal/_posts/2017-06-09-mutexguard-sync.md index 456d289..8bfa213 100644 --- a/personal/_posts/2017-06-09-mutexguard-sync.md +++ b/personal/_posts/2017-06-09-mutexguard-sync.md @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ title: How MutexGuard was Sync When It Should Not Have Been categories: rust research reddit: /rust/comments/6gavfe/how_mutexguard_was_sync_when_it_should_not_have/ +license: CC BY-SA 4.0 +license-url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ --- A couple of weeks ago, our ongoing effort to [formalize Rust's type system]({% post_url 2015-10-12-formalizing-rust %}) lead to us actually discovering a bug in the Rust standard library: @@ -129,3 +131,4 @@ However, I hope I convinced you that if we don't act, errors like the one descri That said, such decisions are of course going to go through the usual RFC process. It's certainly possible that someone comes up with a compromise that preserves some of the usefulness of auto traits, without putting safety at risk. +#### Footnotes