finish and publish unused-data post

[web.git] / ralf / _posts / 2018-12-12-google-scholar.md

diff --git a/ralf/_posts/2018-12-12-google-scholar.md b/ralf/_posts/2018-12-12-google-scholar.md
index 60055b715d334b9d8d86935fd19c3b2e6d717159..28a4806b54131d2a3ba24071c2ae621136dd3aa2 100644 (file)
--- a/ralf/_posts/2018-12-12-google-scholar.md
+++ b/ralf/_posts/2018-12-12-google-scholar.md
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ I even found one vacancy that explicitly requested submitting a Google Scholar p
 Google Scholar provides not just a list of publications (which is of course part of the application, and which is also [available on dblp](http://dblp.org/pers/hd/j/Jung_0002:Ralf)), but also a citation count and computation of several publication-related indices.
 This post is about why I don't have a Google Scholar profile (yet).
 
 Google Scholar provides not just a list of publications (which is of course part of the application, and which is also [available on dblp](http://dblp.org/pers/hd/j/Jung_0002:Ralf)), but also a citation count and computation of several publication-related indices.
 This post is about why I don't have a Google Scholar profile (yet).
 

+<!-- MORE -->
+

 First of all, having a Google Scholar profile requires a Google account.
 There is no technical necessity for this, Google already indexes my papers and other databases (like the aforementioned dblp) manage to create per-author pages just fine without authors having to have an account.
 But, of course, this is a great way for Google to tie more people into their ecosystem -- few kinds of pressure are as effective as when this directly affects hiring decisions.
 First of all, having a Google Scholar profile requires a Google account.
 There is no technical necessity for this, Google already indexes my papers and other databases (like the aforementioned dblp) manage to create per-author pages just fine without authors having to have an account.
 But, of course, this is a great way for Google to tie more people into their ecosystem -- few kinds of pressure are as effective as when this directly affects hiring decisions.


@@ -21,9 +23,10 @@ Turns out I actually *have* a phone number that is public and that I am hence wi
 Seems like they insist on mobile numbers, and that is a piece of data I am not willing to share with the public or Google.
 
 Several people I spoke with were surprised to hear about Google enforcing the disclosure of phone numbers.
 Seems like they insist on mobile numbers, and that is a piece of data I am not willing to share with the public or Google.
 
 Several people I spoke with were surprised to hear about Google enforcing the disclosure of phone numbers.

-I have now tried creating accounts several times, from different browsers and via different internet connections (mobile, work, home) and always got the same result.
+Google themselves say on their [help page](https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1733224?hl=en) that submitting a phone number "is optional but highly recommended".
+That's a lie: I have now tried creating accounts several times, from different browsers and via different internet connections (mobile, work, home) and always got the same dialog asking me for a phone number, with no way to skip.

 I even tried a friend's computer who said he just recently created an account without having to give a phone number.
 I even tried a friend's computer who said he just recently created an account without having to give a phone number.

-I am not sure what kind of profiling Google is doing here, but I was never able to skip the phone validation step.
+I am not sure what kind of profiling Google is doing here, but they seem to have some kind of heuristics for whom they ask for a phone number and whom they don't.

 
 I am considering various options, including getting a cheap prepaid SIM card just for Google.
 All of this may sound somewhat paranoid, but the point I am trying to make is this: at some point we have crossed the barrier where having a Google account was optional.
 
 I am considering various options, including getting a cheap prepaid SIM card just for Google.
 All of this may sound somewhat paranoid, but the point I am trying to make is this: at some point we have crossed the barrier where having a Google account was optional.


@@ -34,7 +37,7 @@ This is not restricted to Google, of course: I have heard of lectures at my univ
 
 I think it is immoral to force people to create accounts in their private name and make them give away their private data.
 Creating an account with Google or Facebook is signing a contract (and one full of dubious data-sharing clauses at that), and I am not entering that contract out of my own free will.
 
 I think it is immoral to force people to create accounts in their private name and make them give away their private data.
 Creating an account with Google or Facebook is signing a contract (and one full of dubious data-sharing clauses at that), and I am not entering that contract out of my own free will.

-(This is very different from accounts I had when working for Mozilla, which were part of a contract between Mozilla and the third party and where I did not have to create an account as a private person. Also, Mozilla actually makes a point of negotiating reasonable data protection clauses for such cases, something I as an individual cannot hope to achieve.)
+Sure, I *could* refuse -- but at which cost?

 
 So, as one tiny of many necessary steps, can we avoid using Google Scholar for making hiring decisions?
 There are other platforms that perform citation analysis, for example [Semantic Scholar](https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/Ralf-Jung/16346001).
 
 So, as one tiny of many necessary steps, can we avoid using Google Scholar for making hiring decisions?
 There are other platforms that perform citation analysis, for example [Semantic Scholar](https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/Ralf-Jung/16346001).