From: Pavel Pravosud <pavel@pravosud.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 06:15:50 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: Fix snipped -> snippet typo
X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/rust-101.git/commitdiff_plain/27a99e3d92e3ce48ed4aeee9527c4adc6d4b68f7?ds=sidebyside;hp=-c

Fix snipped -> snippet typo
---

27a99e3d92e3ce48ed4aeee9527c4adc6d4b68f7
diff --git a/src/part04.rs b/src/part04.rs
index dc116ee..31e8056 100644
--- a/src/part04.rs
+++ b/src/part04.rs
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ fn mutable_ref_demo() {
 //@ than one mutable reference - we only ever borrow `v` once at a time. However, we can *not* create a shared reference that spans a call to `vec_inc`. Just try
 //@ enabling the commented-out lines, and watch Rust complain. This is because `vec_inc` could mutate
 //@ the vector structurally (i.e., it could add or remove elements), and hence the reference `first`
-//@ could become invalid. In other words, Rust keeps us safe from bugs like the one in the C++ snipped above.
+//@ could become invalid. In other words, Rust keeps us safe from bugs like the one in the C++ snippet above.
 //@ 
 //@ Above, I said that having a mutable reference excludes aliasing. But if you look at the code above carefully,
 //@ you may say: "Wait! Don't the `v` in `mutable_ref_demo` and the `v` in `vec_inc` alias?" And you are right,