X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/rust-101.git/blobdiff_plain/9f6c55ebcab2e1d3073e8bb6c8c910d0116efee4..ebb00d95c585dd0520e54ec48df80262f02583cf:/src/part08.rs

diff --git a/src/part08.rs b/src/part08.rs
index 2867a58..ad29565 100644
--- a/src/part08.rs
+++ b/src/part08.rs
@@ -17,22 +17,22 @@ fn overflowing_add(a: u64, b: u64, carry: bool) -> (u64, bool) {
     //@ The reason for this is that many serious security vulnerabilities have been caused by integer overflows, so just assuming
     //@ "per default" that they are intended is dangerous. <br/>
     //@ If you explicitly *do* want an overflow to happen, you can call the `wrapping_add`
-    //@ function (see [the documentation](http://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u64.html#method.wrapping_add),
+    //@ function (see [the documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u64.html#method.wrapping_add),
     //@ there are similar functions for other arithmetic operations). There are also similar functions
     //@ `checked_add` etc. to enforce the overflow check.
-    let sum = u64::wrapping_add(a, b);
+    let sum = a.wrapping_add(b);
     // If an overflow happened, then the sum will be smaller than *both* summands. Without an overflow, of course, it will be
     // at least as large as both of them. So, let's just pick one and check.
     if sum >= a {
         // The addition did not overflow. <br/>
         // **Exercise 08.1**: Write the code to handle adding the carry in this case.
-        let sum_total = u64::wrapping_add(sum, if carry { 1 } else { 0 });      /*@@*/
-        let had_overflow = sum_total < sum;                                     /*@@*/
-        (sum_total, had_overflow)                                               /*@@*/
+        let sum_total = sum.wrapping_add(if carry { 1 } else { 0 });/*@@*/
+        let had_overflow = sum_total < sum;                         /*@@*/
+        (sum_total, had_overflow)                                   /*@@*/
     } else {
         // Otherwise, the addition *did* overflow. It is impossible for the addition of the carry
         // to overflow again, as we are just adding 0 or 1.
-        (sum + if carry { 1 } else { 0 }, true)                                 /*@*/
+        (sum + if carry { 1 } else { 0 }, true)                     /*@*/
     }
 }
 
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ fn test_overflowing_add() {
 impl ops::Add<BigInt> for BigInt {
     //@ Besides static functions and methods, traits can contain *associated types*: This is a type chosen by every particular implementation
     //@ of the trait. The methods of the trait can then refer to that type. In the case of addition, it is used to give the type of the result.
-    //@ (Also see the [documentation of `Add`](http://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ops/trait.Add.html).)
+    //@ (Also see the [documentation of `Add`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ops/trait.Add.html).)
     //@ 
     //@ In general, you can consider the two `BigInt` given above (in the `impl` line) *input* types of trait search: When
     //@ `a + b` is invoked with `a` having type `T` and `b` having type `U`, Rust tries to find an implementation of `Add` for
@@ -118,7 +118,9 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ops::Add<&'a BigInt> for &'b BigInt {
 //@ Rust would not bother compiling them when you just build your program for normal use. Other than that, tests work as usually.
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
-    #[test]
+    use part05::BigInt;
+
+    /*#[test]*/
     fn test_add() {
         let b1 = BigInt::new(1 << 32);
         let b2 = BigInt::from_vec(vec![0, 1]);