X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/rust-101.git/blobdiff_plain/8fcdbed310c53f621fba0401399659ed1a1ec446..a610bd0f496392b0a49640ea931302110570ed6d:/src/part04.rs?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/src/part04.rs b/src/part04.rs index 9a1d22a..cb101fe 100644 --- a/src/part04.rs +++ b/src/part04.rs @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -// Rust-101, Part 04: Ownership, Borrowing -// ======================================= +// Rust-101, Part 04: Ownership, Borrowing, References +// =================================================== //@ Rust aims to be a "safe systems language". As a systems language, of course it //@ provides *references* (or *pointers*). But as a safe language, it has to @@ -43,33 +43,33 @@ fn ownership_demo() { //@ Essentially, ownership rules out aliasing, hence making the kind of problem discussed above //@ impossible. -// ## Shared borrowing +// ## Borrowing a shared reference //@ If you go back to our example with `vec_min`, and try to call that function twice, you will //@ get the same error. That's because `vec_min` demands that the caller transfers ownership of the //@ vector. Hence, when `vec_min` finishes, the entire vector is deleted. That's of course not what //@ we wanted! Can't we somehow give `vec_min` access to the vector, while retaining ownership of it? //@ -//@ Rust calls this *borrowing* the vector, and it works a bit like borrowing does in the real world: -//@ If you borrow a book to your friend, your friend can have it and work on it (and you can't!) -//@ as long as the book is still borrowed. Your friend could even borrow the book to someone else. -//@ Eventually however, your friend has to give the book back to you, at which point you again -//@ have full control. +//@ Rust calls this *a reference* the vector, and it considers references as *borrowing* ownership. This +//@ works a bit like borrowing does in the real world: If your friend borrows a book from you, your friend +//@ can have it and work on it (and you can't!) as long as the book is still borrowed. Your friend could +//@ even lend the book to someone else. Eventually however, your friend has to give the book back to you, +//@ at which point you again have full control. //@ -//@ Rust distinguishes between two kinds of borrows. First of all, there's the *shared* borrow. -//@ This is where the book metaphor kind of breaks down... you can give a shared borrow of +//@ Rust distinguishes between two kinds of references. First of all, there's the *shared* reference. +//@ This is where the book metaphor kind of breaks down... you can give a shared reference to //@ *the same data* to lots of different people, who can all access the data. This of course -//@ introduces aliasing, so in order to live up to its promise of safety, Rust does not allow -//@ mutation through a shared borrow. +//@ introduces aliasing, so in order to live up to its promise of safety, Rust generally does not allow +//@ mutation through a shared reference. -//@ So, let's re-write `vec_min` to work on a shared borrow of a vector, written `&Vec`. +//@ So, let's re-write `vec_min` to work on a shared reference to a vector, written `&Vec`. //@ I also took the liberty to convert the function from `SomethingOrNothing` to the standard //@ library type `Option`. fn vec_min(v: &Vec) -> Option { use std::cmp; let mut min = None; - // This time, we explicitly request an iterator for the vector `v`. The method `iter` borrows the vector - // it works on, and provides shared borrows of the elements. + // This time, we explicitly request an iterator for the vector `v`. The method `iter` just borrows the vector + // it works on, and provides shared references to the elements. for e in v.iter() { // In the loop, `e` now has type `&i32`, so we have to dereference it to obtain an `i32`. min = Some(match min { @@ -81,64 +81,66 @@ fn vec_min(v: &Vec) -> Option { } // Now that `vec_min` does not acquire ownership of the vector anymore, we can call it multiple times on the same vector and also do things like -fn shared_borrow_demo() { +fn shared_ref_demo() { let v = vec![5,4,3,2,1]; let first = &v[0]; vec_min(&v); vec_min(&v); println!("The first element is: {}", *first); } -//@ What's going on here? First, `&` is how you create a shared borrow to something. All borrows are created like -//@ this - there is no way to have something like a NULL pointer. This code creates three shared borrows to `v`: -//@ The borrow for `first` begins in the 2nd line of the function and lasts all the way to the end. The other two -//@ borrows, created for calling `vec_min`, only last for the duration of that respective call. +//@ What's going on here? First, `&` is how you lend ownership to someone - this operator creates a shared reference. +//@ `shared_ref_demo` creates three shared references to `v`: +//@ The reference `first` begins in the 2nd line of the function and lasts all the way to the end. The other two +//@ references, created for calling `vec_min`, only last for the duration of that respective call. //@ -//@ Technically, of course, borrows are pointers. Notice that since `vec_min` only gets a shared -//@ borrow, Rust knows that it cannot mutate `v` in any way. Hence the pointer into the buffer of `v` +//@ Technically, of course, references are pointers. Notice that since `vec_min` only gets a shared +//@ reference, Rust knows that it cannot mutate `v`. Hence the pointer into the buffer of `v` //@ that was created before calling `vec_min` remains valid. -// ## Mutable borrowing -//@ There is a second kind of borrow, a *mutable borrow*. As the name suggests, such a borrow permits -//@ mutation, and hence has to prevent aliasing. There can only ever be one mutable borrow to a -//@ particular piece of data. +// ## Unique, mutable references +//@ There is a second way to borrow something, a second kind of reference: The *mutable reference*. This is a reference that comes with the promise +//@ that nobody else has *any kind of access* to the referee - in contrast to shared references, there is no aliasing with mutable references. It is thus always safe to perform mutation through such a reference. +//@ Because there cannot be another reference to the same data, we could also call it a *unique* reference, but that is not their official name. //@ As an example, consider a function which increments every element of a vector by 1. -//@ The type `&mut Vec` is the type of mutable borrows of `vec`. Because the borrow is -//@ mutable, we can use a mutable iterator, providing a mutable borrow of the elements. +//@ The type `&mut Vec` is the type of mutable references to `vec`. Because the reference is +//@ mutable, we can use a mutable iterator, providing mutable references to the elements. fn vec_inc(v: &mut Vec) { for e in v.iter_mut() { *e += 1; } } // Here's an example of calling `vec_inc`. -fn mutable_borrow_demo() { +fn mutable_ref_demo() { let mut v = vec![5,4,3,2,1]; /* let first = &v[0]; */ vec_inc(&mut v); vec_inc(&mut v); /* println!("The first element is: {}", *first); */ /* BAD! */ } -//@ `&mut` is the operator to create a mutable borrow. We have to mark `v` as mutable in order to create such a -//@ borrow. Because the borrow passed to `vec_inc` only lasts as long as the function call, we can still call -//@ `vec_inc` on the same vector twice: The durations of the two borrows do not overlap, so we never have more -//@ than one mutable borrow. However, we can *not* create a shared borrow that spans a call to `vec_inc`. Just try +//@ `&mut` is the operator to create a mutable reference. We have to mark `v` as mutable in order to create such a +//@ reference: Even though we completely own `v`, Rust tries to protect us from accidentally mutating things. +//@ Hence owned variables that you intend to mutate have to be annotated with `mut`. +//@ Because the reference passed to `vec_inc` only lasts as long as the function call, we can still call +//@ `vec_inc` on the same vector twice: The durations of the two references do not overlap, so we never have more +//@ than one mutable reference - we only ever borrow `v` once at a time. However, we can *not* create a shared reference that spans a call to `vec_inc`. Just try //@ enabling the commented-out lines, and watch Rust complain. This is because `vec_inc` could mutate -//@ the vector structurally (i.e., it could add or remove elements), and hence the pointer `first` -//@ could become invalid. In other words, Rust keeps us safe from bugs like the one in the C++ snipped above. +//@ the vector structurally (i.e., it could add or remove elements), and hence the reference `first` +//@ could become invalid. In other words, Rust keeps us safe from bugs like the one in the C++ snippet above. //@ -//@ Above, I said that having a mutable borrow excludes aliasing. But if you look at the code above carefully, -//@ you may say: "Wait! Don't the `v` in `mutable_borrow_demo` and the `v` in `vec_inc` alias?" And you are right, -//@ they do. However, the `v` in `mutable_borrow_demo` is not actually usable, it is not *active*: As long as there is an -//@ outstanding borrow, Rust will not allow you to do anything with `v`. +//@ Above, I said that having a mutable reference excludes aliasing. But if you look at the code above carefully, +//@ you may say: "Wait! Don't the `v` in `mutable_ref_demo` and the `v` in `vec_inc` alias?" And you are right, +//@ they do. However, the `v` in `mutable_ref_demo` is not actually usable, it is not *active*: As long as `v` is +//@ borrowed, Rust will not allow you to do anything with it. // ## Summary // The ownership and borrowing system of Rust enforces the following three rules: // // * There is always exactly one owner of a piece of data -// * If there is an active mutable borrow, then nobody else can have active access to the data -// * If there is an active shared borrow, then every other active access to the data is also a shared borrow +// * If there is an active mutable reference, then nobody else can have active access to the data +// * If there is an active shared reference, then every other active access to the data is also a shared reference // // As it turns out, combined with the abstraction facilities of Rust, this is a very powerful mechanism // to tackle many problems beyond basic memory safety. You will see some examples for this soon. -//@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part03.html) | [next](part05.html) +//@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part03.html) | [raw source](workspace/src/part04.rs) | [next](part05.html)