X-Git-Url: https://git.ralfj.de/rust-101.git/blobdiff_plain/6b347ac8c0f8710bd0ca42d20d32511fcb53f188..ab7f9b241429bd675b437d2437799de75d2f409b:/src/part09.rs diff --git a/src/part09.rs b/src/part09.rs index 40e32a2..5916258 100644 --- a/src/part09.rs +++ b/src/part09.rs @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ use part05::BigInt; //@ digit comes first. So, we have to write down some type, and implement `Iterator` for it such that `next` returns the digits //@ one-by-one. Clearly, the iterator must somehow be able to access the number it iterates over, and it must store its current //@ location. However, it cannot *own* the `BigInt`, because then the number would be gone after iteration! That'd certainly be bad. -//@ The only alternative is for the iterator to *borrow* the number. +//@ The only alternative is for the iterator to *borrow* the number, so it takes a reference. -//@ In writing this down, we again have to be explicit about the lifetime of the borrow: We can't just have an +//@ In writing this down, we again have to be explicit about the lifetime of the reference: We can't just have an //@ `Iter`, we must have an `Iter<'a>` that borrows the number for lifetime `'a`. This is our first example of //@ a data-type that's polymorphic in a lifetime, as opposed to a type.
//@ `usize` here is the type of unsigned, pointer-sized numbers. It is typically the type of "lengths of things", @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ impl<'a> Iterator for Iter<'a> { // All we need now is a function that creates such an iterator for a given `BigInt`. impl BigInt { //@ Notice that when we write the type of `iter`, we don't actually have to give the lifetime parameter of `Iter`. Just as it is - //@ the case with functions returning borrowed data, you can elide the lifetime. The rules for adding the lifetimes are exactly the + //@ the case with functions returning references, you can elide the lifetime. The rules for adding the lifetimes are exactly the //@ same. (See the last section of [part 06](part06.html).) fn iter(&self) -> Iter { Iter { num: self, idx: self.data.len() } /*@*/ @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ fn print_digits_v2(b: &BigInt) { // ## Iterator invalidation and lifetimes //@ You may have been surprised that we had to explicitly annotate a lifetime when we wrote `Iter`. Of -//@ course, with lifetimes being present at every borrow in Rust, this is only consistent. But do we at +//@ course, with lifetimes being present at every reference in Rust, this is only consistent. But do we at //@ least gain something from this extra annotation burden? (Thankfully, this burden only occurs when we //@ define *types*, and not when we define functions - which is typically much more common.) @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ fn iter_invalidation_demo() { //@ of the right type, the conversion function will not do anything and trivially be optimized away. //@ If you have a look at the documentation of `IntoIterator`, you will notice that the function `into_iter` it provides actually -//@ consumes its argument. So we implement the trait for *borrowed* numbers, such that the number is not lost after the iteration. +//@ consumes its argument. So we implement the trait for *references to* numbers, such that the number is not lost after the iteration. impl<'a> IntoIterator for &'a BigInt { type Item = u64; type IntoIter = Iter<'a>; @@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ impl<'a> IntoIterator for &'a BigInt { } // With this in place, you can now replace `b.iter()` in `main` by `&b`. Go ahead and try it!
//@ Wait, `&b`? Why that? Well, we implemented `IntoIterator` for `&BigInt`. If we are in a place where `b` is already borrowed, we can -//@ just do `for digit in b`. If however, we own `b`, we have to borrow it. Alternatively, we could implement `IntoIterator` +//@ just do `for digit in b`. If however, we own `b`, we have to create a reference to it. Alternatively, we could implement `IntoIterator` //@ for `BigInt` - which, as already mentioned, would mean that `b` is actually consumed by the iteration, and gone. This can easily happen, //@ for example, with a `Vec`: Both `Vec` and `&Vec` (and `&mut Vec`) implement `IntoIterator`, so if you do `for e in v`, and `v` has type `Vec`, //@ then you will obtain ownership of the elements during the iteration - and destroy the vector in the process. We actually did that in //@ `part01::vec_min`, but we did not care. You can write `for e in &v` or `for e in v.iter()` to avoid this. -//@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part08.html) | [next](part10.html) +//@ [index](main.html) | [previous](part08.html) | [raw source](workspace/src/part09.rs) | [next](part10.html)