From 8e6c33aca1747c16072641350fe7d80fff1b44d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:53:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] recommend bubblejail for people that want a more ouf-of-the-box experience --- README.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 5d74547..cee1e66 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ tool to easily sandbox Linux applications. The primary use-case for BubbleBox is running applications that you do not trust enough to give them full access to hour home directory, and in particular the secret keys stored there. -In this regard it is similar to [firejail] and [bubblejail], but less powerful and in exchange hopefully easier to configure. BubbleBox is based on [bubblewrap] and [xdg-dbus-proxy] which do all of the heavy lifting. +The goals of this project are similar to [firejail], but I found firejail's configuration to be extremely hard to maintain and debug. +BubbleBox is meant for people that are comfortable editing its Python source code to adjust it to their needs; +if you are looking for something with a more out-of-the-box experience, try [bubblejail]. + [firejail]: https://firejail.wordpress.com/ [bubblejail]: https://github.com/igo95862/bubblejail [bubblewrap]: https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap -- 2.30.2